Roseanne Barr has found a Supreme Court case for the Freedom of Speech on Private Property. When a company's existence has created a monopoly and there is no other means of communicating. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/326/501/case.html
As it applies to Amendment I, Black stresses that the prohibitions placed on limitations of free expression are to be read literally. That Amendment explicitly guarantees rights of freedom of speech, press, and religion, the right peaceably to assemble, and the right to petition the government for redress of grievances, and it affirms these with the specific words "Congress shall make no law abridging" them. Thus, according to Black, the Framers intended no partial or diluted protection,
no weak-kneed idea that they are merely admonitions. He believes that the Court is obliged by the Framers "to enforce the First Amendment to the full extent of its express and unequivocal terms."3 * Assistant Professor of Government, Sacramento State College;
https://youtu.be/u3-cntVRT-o
Marsh v. Alabama, 326 U.S. 501 (1946), was a case decided by the United StatesSupreme Court, in which it ruled that a state trespassing statute could not be used to prevent the distribution of religious materials on a town's sidewalk, even though the sidewalk was part of a privately owned company town.
https://youtu.be/u3-cntVRT-o
Marsh v. Alabama, 326 U.S. 501 (1946), was a case decided by the United StatesSupreme Court, in which it ruled that a state trespassing statute could not be used to prevent the distribution of religious materials on a town's sidewalk, even though the sidewalk was part of a privately owned company town.
Marsh v. Alabama - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marsh_v._Alabama
No comments:
Post a Comment